Who is Considered the Best Batman?

before we look at each actor individually and compare, what is it that we are looking for? How should Batman and Bruce Wayne actually come across? How should they be portrayed? Well, we simply need to look at the most common version of the character throughout the comics. We can also use two other very accurate adaptations of Batman as a source of comparison, and that is, of course, the Batman animated series version and the version seen in the Arkham video games.

Very few people would disagree that both of those perfectly capture the essence of the character. Batman embodies the duality of human nature. He is a symbol of fear and darkness, instilling terror in the hearts of criminals. Yet, he is also a symbol of hope and justice, inspiring the people of Gotham to rise above their fears and fight for a better world.

Batman operates in the shadows, working outside the boundaries of the law to dismantle organized crime and confront the city’s most nefarious villains. On the surface, Bruce Wayne is a charismatic and affluent playboy, known for his extravagant lifestyle and prestigious Wayne Enterprises. He embodies the epitome of wealth and privilege.

Let’s take a look at the different live-action attempts.

Adam West

Adam West’s portrayal of Batman in the 1960s Batman television series showcased a campy and light-hearted version of the character. His performance was characterized by a distinct blend of seriousness and comedic charm, making the show an instant hit.

While his portrayal may not really align with the dark and brooding nature of the character as depicted in the comics, West’s Batman left an indelible mark on popular culture and introduced Batman to a wider audience. It’s really hard to say that Adam West portrayed Batman accurately. The show was more a reflection of the time, the 60s.

It kind of made sense there and then, but neither Batman nor Bruce Wayne were particularly accurate to the original idea of the character. Yes, there was a lot of crime fighting, problem-solving, and detective work, but not really in the way that they were intended to be done. It was over the top for comedic relief, and that, in my opinion, makes it very inaccurate.

Michael Keaton

Michael Keaton’s portrayal in Tim Burton’s Batman films, Batman in 1989 and Batman Returns in 1992, revitalized the character on the big screen. Keaton brought a unique intensity while also infusing the character with charismatic charm. His performance showcased the duality of Batman’s identity, creating a believable and captivating portrayal that resonated with audiences.

Now, while this may be true, is it accurate? Well, I am a fan of his portrayal of Bruce Wayne. I wouldn’t necessarily call him an eccentric billionaire, but at the same time, I wouldn’t really believe him to be spending his nights fighting crime, so I guess the role of Bruce Wayne is played well.

However, as Batman, he does come across as a symbol of fear and justice. But it lacks so many elements of the character. For example, detective work. Batman is, of course, the world’s greatest detective, and it’s a huge element of who he is as a character, as a hero. So, taking that away from him kind of makes it, again, an inaccurate portrayal.

Val Kilmer

While Val Kilmer is largely forgotten about as Batman by many casual fans, he actually brought a different take to the character. Kilmer’s portrayal of Batman showcased a balance between the brooding, intense nature of the character and a more introspective and emotional side.

He captured the essence of Bruce Wayne’s internal struggles and the weight he carries as a protector of Gotham City. Kilmer’s performance exuded a sense of sophistication and intelligence but did not really reflect that billionaire playboy persona that Bruce Wayne should adopt in public. In fact, he comes across quite openly heroic as Bruce Wayne in some scenes. But again, that mainly comes down to the writing and not necessarily Kilmer’s portrayal. One notable aspect of Kilmer’s performance was his physicality. He brought a graceful and athletic presence to the role, displaying agility and combat skills that befit Batman’s reputation as a formidable fighter.

Kilmer’s Batman moved with a certain fluidity, emphasizing his prowess in martial arts and his ability to strike fear into the hearts of criminals. In terms of the character’s psychology, Kilmer portrayed Bruce Wayne’s internal conflicts and torments with subtlety and depth. He captured the inner turmoil and psychological scars that drive Batman’s mission, exploring the duality of the character’s personality.

Kilmer’s portrayal showcased the internal battle between Bruce’s desire for justice and his struggle to find peace within himself. When we start talking about accuracy, I think a lot of things here were done correctly. However, due to the nature of the film Batman Forever, which I’m not going to go into now, certain aspects and elements were forgotten.

George Clooney

Uh, where to start? I want to be nice. I want to be positive, but it’s tough. I’ll try. Clooney’s physicality as Batman was relatively solid, showcasing a more imposing and muscular presence. He had a commanding presence in the Batsuit, and his fight sequences displayed some of Batman’s combat skills.

However, the overall portrayal of Batman leaned more towards the action hero archetype, rather than exploring the character’s nuanced layers. He was more of a suave and charismatic Bruce Wayne, capturing the billionaire playboy persona with his smooth demeanor and sophisticated style. He embodied the public image that Bruce Wayne presents to the world, exuding confidence and charm.

Clooney’s Bruce Wayne was depicted as a charismatic figure, engaging in witty banter and displaying a certain level of self-assuredness. However, one aspect of Clooney’s portrayal that received criticism was the lack of depth and emotional complexity in his portrayal as Batman. The film’s lighter tone and focus on over-the-top action sequences often overshadowed the character’s internal struggles and psychological depth.

As a result, Clooney’s Batman appeared somewhat one-dimensional, lacking the brooding intensity and internal conflicts that are typically associated with the Dark Knight. It just felt like he couldn’t take anything seriously. We just have to look at the scene where he’s informing Robin that Alfred is dying. It looks like he finds it kind of funny. It really, really frustrates me.

Christian Bale

Christian Bale’s portrayal in Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight trilogy pushed the boundaries of Batman’s complexity and realism. Bale’s commitment to the role was evident in his physical transformation, intense performance, and nuanced portrayal of both Batman and Bruce Wayne.

He emphasized the psychological and emotional struggles of the character, showcasing the internal conflicts that drive Batman’s vigilantism. Bale’s embodiment of Batman became the benchmark against which subsequent portrayals would be measured. However, a lot of what I’m talking about here is mainly thanks to the writing, not the portrayal.

 

Talking about Bale himself, he obviously got extremely in shape. He moved very well. He had believable armor and gadgets but wasn’t as physically intimidating as Batman could be. I also have to mention the voice. Now, while I think Batman should obviously have a different voice to Bruce Wayne, Bale’s got a little bit out of hand.

It started off okay, then almost seemed like he was impersonating and mocking himself as the films went on. However, having said that, his Bruce Wayne I feel was spot on. You see him in some of the scenes in the first two movies and, and you would never connect this asshole with the guy that risks his life every night to protect the innocents, to fight corruption and injustice. He comes across perfectly as that rich guy that thinks there are no consequences to his actions.

But his Batman could use some work.

Ben Affleck

Ben Affleck’s portrayal of Batman in the DC Extended Universe, particularly Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice and Justice League, presented a more seasoned and wearier version of the Dark Knight. Affleck brought a rugged physicality and a world-weary demeanor to the role, emphasizing Batman’s seasoned crime-fighting experience.

His performance showcased a jaded and battle-worn Batman, haunted by past failures. Although the films received mixed reviews, Affleck’s portrayal was generally regarded as one of the highlights. He was almost the most believable in the suit, being genuinely quite intimidating and terrifying. You sort of understand why criminals would fear this man.

The same can’t really be said as convincingly at least for any of the other actors. As for his portrayal of Bruce Wayne, the stuck-up billionaire stuff works well, he looks rich and important. But I also don’t think he quite does a good enough job of being eccentric enough to prevent any suspicion of him spending his nights in a cape and cowl.

Robert Pattinson

Robert Pattinson’s portrayal in The Batman brings a fresh interpretation to the character. It’s certainly a darker and more introspective Batman, exploring the detective aspect of the character. Pattinson’s talent and dedication to his craft make him an intriguing choice, and his performance does bring a new dimension to the character.

However, in my opinion, he lacks the physicality necessary to truly be a believable Dark Knight. And while his portrayal of Bruce was intentionally different from the essence of the character, being introverted and isolated rather than an eccentric billionaire playboy, it still worked very well for this version of the character, but again, doesn’t make it the most accurate.

Final Thoughts

it is important to acknowledge the unique contributions and interpretations brought to Batman by Adam West, Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, George Clooney, and Robert Pattinson. Each actor has left their mark on the character, adding new layers and dimensions. So, basically, if we could get Affleck Batman with Bales Bruce, I think we’re onto a winner.

At the end of the day, it will always be a personal thing. I have tried my best to stay neutral and just think about, not who I consider to be the best, but who was the most accurate.